Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Alien NON-Disclosure Document Will Astound You


Before It's News | Popular Lifestyle

Alien NON-Disclosure Document Will Astound You

By Susan Duclos
 
Below are the contents of a document listed as Top Secret, revealed from a Freedom of Information Act request, which discusses relationships with extraterrestrial that land on Earth, given as advice, via a letter detailed in the video below, to politicians and military leaders.
 
This top secret letter offers options that in light of claims that aliens do indeed walk among us and hidden from human beings, is quite relevant because the 'advice" does suggest the best option would be to provide "for the peaceful absorption of the celestrial race(s) in such a manner that our culture would remain intact with guarantees that their presence not be revealed. . ."
 
This letter was retyped by Sky Ships Over Cashiers because the document was not sharp enough to easily read but they clearly state they did NO editing and even left grammatical and spelling errors in place.
 
The most astounding this is that this letter was written in June 1947, a month before the Roswell incident and was written by two of the smartest scientists in history......... Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer and Professor Albert Einstein.
 
Key quotes listed below, then the video going over the entire letter and finally the entirety of the transcribed letter below the video.

 


(Spelling errors from the original letter left as is)

 


• The most feasible solution it seem would be this one, submitt an agreement providing for the peaceful absorbtion of the celestrial race(s) in such a manner that our culture would remain intact with guarantees that their presence not be revealed. . .


 


• The presence of unidentified space craft flying in our atmosphere (and possibly maintaining orbits about our planet) is now, however, accepted as defacto by our military.


 


Did leaders take their advice, and have they been hiding extraterrestrials, and are they about the disclose this decades after the fact?

 



 


Transcribed letter:

 


DRAFT June 1947


 


Relationships with Inhabitants

Of Celestrial Bodies

 


          Relationships with extraterrestrial men presents no bascially new problem from the standpoint of international law; but the possibility of confronting intelligent beings that do not belong to the human race would bring up problems whose solution it is difficult to conceive. . .


 


          In the first place, it would be necessary to establish communication with them through some language or other, and afterwards, as a first condition for all intelligence, that they should have a psychology similar to that of men.


 


          At any rate, international law should make place for a new law on a different basis, and it might be called “Law Among Planetary Peoples,” following the guidelines found in the Pentateuch. . . . 


 


         If these intelligent beings were in possession of a more or less culture, and a more or less perfect political organization, they would have an absolute right to be recognized as independent and soverign peoples, we would have to come to an agreement with them to establish the legal regulations upon which future relationships should be based, and it would be necessary to accept many of their principles.


 


         Finally, if they should reject all peaceful cooperation and become an imminent threat to the earth, we would have the right to legitimate defense, but only insofar as would be necessary to annul this danger.


 


                                                          *****


          Another possibility may exist, that a species of homosapiens might have established themselves as an independent nation on another celestrial body in our solar system and evolved culturely indenpendently from ours.  Obviously, this possibility depends on many circumstances, whose conditions cannot yet be foreseen. . . .


 


*****


          Now we come to the problem of determining what to do if the inhabitants of clestrial bodies, or extraterrestrial biological entities (EBE) desire to settle here.


 


1. If they are politically organized and possess a certain culture similar to our own, they may be recognized as a independent people.  They could consider what degree of development would be required on earth for colonizing. 






2. If they consider our culture to be devoid of political unity, they would have the right to colonize.  Of course, this colonization cannot be conducted on classic lines.






          A superior form of colonizing will have to be conceived, that could be a kind of tutelage, possibly through the tacit approval of the United Nations. . . .  


 


*****


 


          It is difficult to predict what the attitude of international law will be with regard to the occupation by celestrial peoples of certain locations on our planet, but the only thing that can be foreseen is that there will be a profound change in traditional concepts.






          We cannot exclude the possibility that a race of extraterrestrial people more advanced technologically and economically may take upon itself the right to occupy another celestrial body. . . .  






          4. A moral entity?  The most feasible solution it seem would be this one, submitt an agreement providing for the peaceful absorbtion of the celestrial race(s) in such a manner that our culture would remain intact with guarantees that their presence not be revealed. . . 


 


*****


 


         And now to the final question of whether the presence of celestrial astroplanes in our atmosphere is a direct result of our testing atomic weapons?


 


         The presence of unidentified space craft flying in our atmosphere (and possibly maintaining orbits about our planet) is now, however, accepted as defacto by our military.


 


         . . . .The use of the atomic bomb combined with space vehicles poses a threaton a scale which make it absolutely necessary to come to an agreement in this area.  With the appearance of unidentified space vehicles (opinions are sharply divided as to their origin) over the skies of Europe and the United States has sustained an ineradical fear, an anxiety about security, that is driving the great powers to make an effort to find a solution to the threat.


 


         Military strategists foresee the use of space craft with nuclear warheads as the ultimate weapon of war. Even the deployment of artificial satellites for intelligence gathering and target selection is not far off. . . . Attack no longer comes from an exclusive direction, nor from a determined country, but from the sky, with the practical impossibility of determining who the aggressor is, now to intercept the attack, or how to effect immediate reprisals.  These problems are compounded further by identification.  How does the air defense radar operator identify, or more precisely, classify his target?


 


         . . . . When artificial satellites and missiles find their place in space, we must consider the potential threat that unidentified space craft pose.  One must consider the fact that mis-identification of these space craft for a intercontenental missile in re-entry phase of flight could lead to accidental nuclear war with horrible consequences.


 


         Lastly, we should consider the possibility that our atmospheric tests of late could have influenced the arrival of celestrial scrutiny.  They could have been curious or even alarmed by such activity (and rightly so, for the Russians would make every effort to observe and record such tests).


 


        


In conclusion, it is our professional opinion based on submitted data that this situation is extremely perilous, and measures must be taken to rectify a very serious problem are very apparent.


 




                                                Respectfully,


 


                                                Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer

                                                Director of Advanced Studies

                                                Princeton, New Jersey


 


                                                            Professor Albert Einstein

                                                Princeton, New Jersey


 


 



 


 


 


 


Susan Duclos owns/writes Wake up America

 


 


 




No comments:

Post a Comment