From the trenches to the minds of the under-informed, supplying information to arm ones self of their rights and responsibilities to maintain ones freedom.
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Expolsive, Bizarre, and MIND CONTROL?
EXPLOSIVE! This should be read with an ounce of skepticism for the moment. I have only found a few sources for this. The reason I am printing this article, is because I find this interesting and disturbing enough to do some investigation. I also have recently discovered a few confirmed stories at RT and BBC NEWS that have helped me make sense of this article.
http://www.dailypaul.com/300109/dc-navy-yard-shooting-linked-to-attempted-arrest-of-obama-for-treason-aka-false-flag-nuke-attack-on-washington
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=256917
Regardless of the fact that I have been unable to do some major digging on this, that does not however, indicate in any way such an allegation should be swept under the rug as usual. It needs to be investigated and vetted with an open mind and an open ear.
Also, while the above link is bizarre, it could make alot more sense than even I want it to. There have been multiple instances in the past few years that have been in direct conflict with the Obama administration. Such allegations of the above only fall piece by piece when one mentions names such as:
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/9/kuhner-who-betrayed-navy-seal-team-6/
Sgt. Gary Stein
Amb. Chris StevensTyrone Woods
Sean Smith
Glen Doherty
Gen. James Mad Dog Mattis
Bradley Manning
Edward Snowden
Maj. Gen. C.M.M. Gurganus
Gen. Carter Ham
Adm. Charles M. Gaouette
Vice Adm. Tim Giardina
Maj. Gen. Michael Carey
Maj. Gen. Gregg A. Sturdevant
Brig. Gen. Bryan Roberts
Now when one notices who these officers are being replaced by, it should raise everyones eyebrows.These Military top brass names are among reports of having been purged by President Obama. The reason is very peculiar in perspective to this entire piece.These top officers have stated that they have been asked questions to the perception that they would at some point be ordered to fire on American Citizens.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzT6X3_Bg9o&feature=youtube_gdata_player
http://archive.org/stream/LeakedU.s.ArmyDocumentOutlinesPlanForRe-educationCampsInAmerica/UsArmy
What I can tell you though, is on the morning of the Washington D.C. Navy Yard shooting on Sept. 16, 2013. The official report is that the first responders C.E.R.T. were given orders by their superior officers at the Capitol Police Command to "stand down, and disperse from the scene."
RT NEWS:
http://rt.com/usa/capitol-first-response-navy-yard-044/
One of the first responders made this statement. " I don't think its a far stretch to say that some lives may have been saved, if we were allowed to intervene".
WND Congressman Michael McCaul of TX. confirms Capitol Police sources have informed him the order to stand down was given on the morning of Sept. 16, 2013.
http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/09/congressman-confirms-stand-down-order-at-navy-yard/
Another by the Capitol Police officer said "They were relying on our commanding officers to make the right call" and another said" Unfortunately I don't think that happened in this case."
BBC NEWS:http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/24153252
Senate Sgt At Arms Terry Gainer to BBC NEWS said that the Capitol Police officials were in fact pulling radio logs from the incident on Monday Sept. 16, 2013.
Another puzzling statememt from Gainer was when he said " the department's primary responsibility is the Capitol Compex, the complex houses Congress, that mission did not allow it to turn a "blind eye" when asked for assistance".
Another officer states, "he heard the request from C.E.R.T. over the radio, and also reported that his colleagues were "frustrated" with the orders to "stand down".
I want to take a moment to remind you that this is not the first time the Obama administration has given an order to stand down. This order to stand down obviously is not directed specifically at the Obama administration, but one should at least be compelled to ask the question "Who does the Capitol Police Command Center's orders actually come from?
It should be quite obvious.The Capitol Police are absolutely not taking orders from the Washington D.C. Metro Police. That would be like F.B.I. arriving on the scene of a high profile case in Miami FL., and the Miami P.D. order F.B.I. to stand down. We all have seen more than enough movies to have a comprehension of how this situation would eventually play out.
Enter Benghazi, Libya. Sept. 11, 2012 reports that not only were cables to then Secretary of state Hillary Clinton requesting backup have been confirmed, there have been numerous reports of CIA operatives that were on the ground that night in the Benghazi attack and offered no assistance. Not to mention, these same CIA operatives who were on the ground have been subjected to numerous polygraph tests to verify they are not leaking any information to members of the Congress or the Press, theres even reports that these operatives have been told " keep silent, or you jeopardize your family."
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/06/politics/benghazi-whistleblower/index.html
Congressman Darrel Issa CA., personally places the responsibility at the feet of Hillary Clinton.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/05/issa-benghazi-attack-result-of-hillary-clintons-reckless-ill-advised-war-on-terror-policies-video/
CIA Whistleblower confirms that the ONLY person authorized to grant cross-border permission was President Barack Hussein Obama. The CIA whistleblower goes on to state that Obama has been quite ambiguous when it comes to decisions that are exclusively his to make, in the sense that he informs his team of "aides" to do what they "think is right".
The whistleblower also states that President Obama did not keep himself apprised of the developments in Benghazi when he was notified of immediate dangers the servicemen at the consulate were facing.One false statement specifically confirmed as having been perpetuated and propagated by Barack Obama. The fabrication came on the heels of the attack claiming that the reason for the attack on the consulate was a result of a "you tube video".
Perhaps Barack Obama does not take his responsibilities seriously when our service men and women are concerned.
Some questions our friend the whistleblower has demanded answers to are, Why would Obama not authorize the rescue mission? Why did the President not order our officers out of Benghazi upon being briefed of the immediate danger the consulate faced? Why the lies about the you tube video? Why do nothing at all and take no action to save the lives of Chris Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith, and Glen Doherty?Why President Obama would seem like he had something to gain by not taking any action, and when Barack Obama hit the campaign trail the very next morning it was clear to the families of the fallen as well as the whistleblower that Barack Obama and his "aides" left these four men to die deliberately.
The only issue that befuddles me is why did the mainstream media refuse to cover this? This story in a media that was in reality a free press would have floored the entire country. Unless of course there were other parts of the equation preventing the main stream media from reporting the facts and holding to account corrupt officials? Could this among the rest of the pressing "phony scandals" under the Obama administration have anything to do with the repeal of the Smith Mundt Act?
The Obama administration has utilized the deceptive techniques of liberal debate to dehumanize ANY member of the Press or individual in general by talking down on them, talking over them, name calling, repetetive lying, and the psychological effects of fear mongering and manipulating ones emotions.The Obama administration has undoubtedly been accused of using the IRS as a political weapon against all political opposition forces. The NSA scandal is still steeping of dung, and has an ever increasing stench of invasion of privacy. The Obama administration has attacked FOX NEWS reporter James Rosen for using the right to freedom of the press.
The Free Press has been established as a link between the peoples right to hold to account corrupt politicians.The Smith Mundt Act was established in 1948 for the people. As I mentioned in an earlier post, a press that is not free represents the agenda of the STATE, and that in and of itself is a conflict of interest.In order to be more specific the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The First Amendment as follows:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, nor the presses, nor the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievences."
The Free Press can only work for a Free People.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130715/11210223804/anti-propaganda-ban-repealed-freeing-state-dept-to-direct-its-broadcasting-arm-american-citizens.shtml
Reenter the D.C. Navy Yard shooting. At this point there is clear evidence to question Alexis grant to "secret" security clearance, especially considering Alexis 34 was discharged from the Navy only two years before as a result of questionable "mental stability". Reports that verify the U.S. Government has previously treated Aaron Alexis for mental health issues. Some of these issues are mental illneses such as paranoia and sleep disorder, along with claims of hearing voices.
Another concern is that Alexis was granted "secret" clearance without having informed the D.O.D. of his prior incidents involving firearms and law enforcement arrests. Alexis neglected to report this to D.O.D., as D.O.D. did not properly investigate the contractor prior to issuing his "secret" clearance status just recently during this past July of 2013.
Other concerns stem from the chilling messages etched into the side of his firearm. Messages such as "end to the torment", "not what ya'll say", "better off this way", and the most bizarre one of the four being" my ELF weapon".
The F.B.I. claims the E.L.F. weapon might have been referring to an "extremely low frequency" electromagnetic wave.
In an electronic document left by Alexis that was later retrieved by the F.B.I. Alexis confirms the F.B.I. explanation by comfirming he was under "Ultra low frequency attack is what I've been subject to for the last three months, and to be perfectly honest that is what has driven me to this".
With this statement I direct you to also investigate claims of the Oct. 3, 2013 incident.
http://technewsnow.com/news/miriam-carey-woman-killed-in-capitol-car-chase-believed-obama-electronically-monitoring-her
Now as I mentioned in the opening statement of this article, be discretionary. The fact that I have been in the process of writing this piece for hours today speaks solely to the issues I have run into digging for the address of the Navy Yard shooting. I cannot find a name for the Provost Marshall, nor can I dig up any information on the victims names that have been released in terms of possible military officers that may have been killed and or injured during this incident. There is one claim that the address of the naval yard incident was in fact 716 Sicard St. Suite 2000. That is the same address I have been able to look into for the location of the Provost Marshall. However, I can not confirm that report. The fact that this story is so disturbing and there seems to be alot of unanswered questions surrounding the emerging details, and the lack of evidence to support this argument makes it that much more plausable.
I can only testify to the fact that when I first received the story the article disappeared the same moment I attempted to bookmark the story originally published by PressCore. I coincidentally recieved an error message that explained I did not have permission to access that site, as well as another statement telling me that the page link was broke.
http://www.foxbaltimore.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/names-all-12-navy-yard-shooting-victims-now-released-22362.shtml?wap=0#.Ul29mD8pDJs
Here is yet one more allegation of an instance concerning an ELF weapon, or an extremely low frequency electromagnetic waves.Remember the 34 year old Dental Hygienist Miriam Carey? The crazed woman who drove her car into a WhiteHouse gate. This woman lived in Connecticut. She was a ways from home on the day of Oct 3, 2013. She allegedly led police in D.C. on a high speed chase that ended in front of the White House. What is odd about this story is the timing lining up to the day with rumors of an Oct. surprise. This so called "surprise" was set to happen on Oct. 3, 2013.
Miriam Carey had alledged the year before in 2012 that Barack Obama was electronically monitoring her.
http://www.dailypaul.com/301451/miriam-careys-sister-valaries-openletter-warning-to-america-cops-you-could-be-next-is-this-the-kind-of-country-you-want
It fits directly into the F.B.I. assumption or theory of an "extremely low frequency electromagnetic wave".Now does it beg the question how plausable mind control theories may be? Both incidents took place in a matter of weeks. Both incidents accuse someone or something of stalking them. Both incidents resulted in the alleged mind control victims death. Both incidents are equally as bizarre, with the exception of a possible allegation against Barack Obama for treason. Maybe they were both just lunatics, or maybe they were under the influence of electromagnetic waves?
Either way you choose to look at it, Alexis was treated for mental issues specifically "hearing voices", and Miriam Carey had been previously diagnosed as being schizophrenic. Schizophrenia is basically the medical term for hearing voices. Miriam Carey's allegations that Barack Obama was stalking her align with Aaron Alexis' s document he had left behind with the statement that "Ultralow frequency attack is what he has been subject to for three months".
The F.B.I. offered the explanation that leads to a conclusion of mind control. The U.S. airforce has confirmed in military documents the technology of H.A.A.R.P., which admits to using electromagnetic waves. The instrument is capable of wiping out communications and sending out frequency waves of communication.
http://www.chronicle.su/news/snowden-reveals-haarps-global-assassination-agenda/
How much of a coincidence do you think it may be? Just 5 days after NSA Whistleblower releases a document on H.A.A.R.P. or High Frequency Aural Assistance Research Program, the U.S. Government "closes" the facility.
http://www.arrl.org/news/haarp-facility-shuts-down
These mind control allegations may be implying a pattern that is beginning to emerge.
http://m.wmctv.com/#!/newsDetail/23447779
Posted by Lynn Tantrum at 12:44 PM
Email This Blog This! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Older Post Home View mobile version Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Lynn Tantrum
View my complete profile
Google+ Followers
Follow by Email
Blog Archive
▼ 2013 (4)▼ October (4)Expolsive, Bizarre, and MIND CONTROL?Main Stream Media and the Freedom of InformationU.N. Disarmament of America?President Obama holds absolutely no respect for ou...
Video Bar
Loading...
Total Pageviews
Translate
LynnTantrum. Simple template. Powered by Blogger.
Welcome to your weekly start or sit column. Before we proceed, let me tell you that this article is NOT here to state the obvious. I will not ever recommend you start Adrian Peterson, Drew Brees, Calvin Johnson or Jimmy Graham. The fact is you should like your fantasy football live under the following mantra: START YOUR STUDS!! If you need me to tell you to start your studs, you need a lot more help than this column will provide.
There may be some rare occasions where I might possibly suggest you sit a top-level player simply based on the match up. I’ve done similar things in the past for WR’s scheduled to be on Revis Island. That all being said, if you don’t see your player named on the start list, that doesn’t mean it’s a suggestion you sit him. If you don’t see your player named on the sit list, that doesn’t mean you should start him. For any lineup questions you should visit the FFLockerroom forums and one of our staff of experts will address your specific question. With all that out of the way, let’s get to it.
Quarterback
Start ‘em
Andrew Luck (vs. DEN) – Peyton Manning comes to town and after some of the comments by Colts owner Jim Irsay which seemed to indicate his disappointment in only winning one Super Bowl with Manning at the helm, Peyton is probably going to light up the Colts. Why am I mentioning all of this when talking about Luck? Because it means Luck will be trying to prove the Colts made the right call. He’ll drastically increase his number of pass attempts and the Colts will look like the pass happy team they were last year. Denver is last in the league in passing yards against with 338 per game. They’ve also given up 11 touchdowns.
Nick Foles (vs. DAL) – One week after lighting up the sky Foles gets Dallas and their 30th ranked pass defense. The Cowboys surrender 308 yards per game through the air. More importantly, they’ve allowed opposing quarterbacks to toss 14 touchdowns, tied for most in the league. The Cowboys will now also be without standout pass rusher DeMarcus Ware. If Alex Smith can light up the Cowboys with a healthy DeMarcus Ware, imagine what Foles can do without Ware harassing him.
Chad Henne (vs. SD) – The Jaguars stink. It’s that simple. But, they are less odorous with Chad Henne than they were with Blaine Gabbert. San Diego is 25th in the league giving up 273 yards per game through the air and they simply don’t have anyone who can stop Justin Blackmon. Philip Rivers and company should be able to score plenty on the Jaguars so Henne will do plenty of throwing trying to keep up.
Jay Cutler (at WAS) – Cutler travels to Washington to face a defense ranked 24th in the league allowing 272 passing yards per game. The good news for Cutler is his offensive line is doing a great job protecting him as he’s only been sacked nine times. Anyone who’s seen Cutler over the years knows he’s not the best under duress. He’s coming off three straight 20+ fantasy point weeks and I think this week he makes it four.
Sit ‘em
Sam Bradford (at CAR) – Carolina holds opposing quarterbacks to just over 10 fantasy points per game. They’ve surrendered 4 passing touchdowns while picking off 8 passes. Don’t be sucked in by Bradford’s performance the past two weeks. Carolina is much softer against the run and based on how they shut down quarterbacks, the Rams would be wise to use a run-heavy attack on Sunday.
Alex Smith (vs. HOU) – I’ve been fairly successful with my Alex Smith recommendations this year but this week I’m running for the hills. The Houston Texans are tops in the NFL giving up only 131 yards per game through the air. That’s 57 yards less than the 2nd best team. The numbers are slightly misleading since Houston has had a couple of blowouts and quarterbacks have only attempted 137 passes against then but it’s still an ominous stat that scares me off Smith this week.
Colin Kaepernick (at TEN) – As someone who was high on Kaepernick coming in it pains me to include him here but facts are facts. Kaepernick hasn’t been a reliable fantasy performer since his Week 1 explosion against Green Bay. This week he travels across country to face a formidable Tennessee Titans defense. The Titans have held down such performers as Philip Rivers, Russell Wilson and Ben Roethlisberger so I expect them to keep Kaepernick in check this week.
Running Back
Start ‘em
Eddie Lacy (vs. CLE) – Lacy has simply been too good not to play. He had 23 carries each of the last two games and it appears Aaron Rodgers has no problems giving him the ball. Last week he ran right over what used to be a stout Ravens run defense. This week he faces a Browns defense that only gives up 98.2 yards per game but that’s the exact average the Ravens are at even after Lacy ran over them last week. Also, Cleveland has given up eight touchdowns to running backs. That’s good news for Lacy.
Ryan Matthews (at JAX) – Matthews is fresh off a 100 yard game and now he gets to face the team that’s 32nd in the league against the run, allowing 152.5 yards per game? Yeah, I’d say the odds are in your favor of Matthews have another solid performance. Philip Rivers and company should be able to get the lead and then lean on Matthews to milk the clock the rest of the way.
Knowshon Moreno (at IND) – Above I discussed how Peyton Manning is going to come into Indianapolis and light up the sky but the one thing I didn’t mention is that Manning is the smartest player to ever play the quarterback position. You don’t think he knows that Indianapolis is 31st in the league giving up 132 yards per game on the ground? Trust me, Moreno will have his opportunities to score. Even better, Moreno also has 20 receptions for 189 yards this year too.
DeAngelo Williams (vs. STL) – St. Louis gives up 130.5 yards per game on the ground. That’s good for 30th in the NFL. They are surrendering 4.6 yards per carry! In addition, he was finally involved in the passing game in Week 6 catching five passes. Three running backs have topped 140 yards and seven have found the end zone. With nobody to share carries with Williams is a viable option each and every week.
Sit ‘em
Trent Richardson (vs. DEN) – Thus far Richardson hasn’t hit his stride in Indianapolis. Against the leagues #1 rush defense, I don’t expect him to hit it this week. I’m sure the Colts will try to establish the run because keeping Peyton Manning off the field is the only way to win. However, until Richardson shows me something, I’m not riding this horse to victory.
Stevan Ridley (at NYJ) – I’m very encouraged by last week’s performance from Ridley. I’m glad Bill Belichick realizes LaGarrette Blount stinks. That being said, this week Ridley is running into a brick wall. The Jets only give up 75.7 yards per game on the ground. This looks like Tom Brady’s week, especially since there’s no love lost between Belichick and Rex Ryan. Don’t be surprised to see New England in the no huddle and passing even with a lead in the 4th quarter.
Zac Stacy (at CAR) – Carolina has a fearsome front seven that’s only giving up 88.8 yards per game on the ground. Add to that the Rams haven’t scored a rushing touchdown all season. The Panthers held down the likes of Adrian Peterson and Marshawn Lynch. The percentages say they’ll stymie Stacy too.
Doug Martin (at ATL) – Perhaps this one is a stretch but let’s face it, anyone who drafted Martin is very disappointed right now. This week he gets Atlanta’s sixth ranked rush defense. The defensive unit is only giving up 97.4 yards per game on the ground. Martin can certainly get involved through the air and that’s where I’d hope for stats in a PPR format but in a standard league, I’m probably looking elsewhere.
Wide Receivers
Start ‘em
T.Y. Hilton (at DEN) – With the huge match up against Denver, I expect Andrew Luck to put on an air-show this weekend. Denver will likely be focusing their attention on long time reliable threat Reggie Wayne that should free up Hilton for some one-on-one action. In a game that could be a shootout, you don’t want to leave a threat like Hilton on the pine. This could be a game where he sees well into double-digit targets and if Luck is on his game, a big statistical day.
Antonio Brown (vs. BAL) – Brown will be facing a Baltimore defense that has allowed four wide receivers to eclipse the 100-yard mark. The return of Heath Miller was just what Brown needed to have more room to work. In his last three contests Brown is averaging 10 catches for 123 yards. He hasn’t found the end zone since his Week 3 performance against Chicago but if the Steelers are going to beat the Ravens, they’ll need Brown to have a big day.
Jarrett Boykin (vs. CLE) – It’s looking more and more likely that James Jones won’t be active this Sunday, which thrusts Boykin in #2 wide receiver duties. As we’ve seen over the years, it’s a very good spot to be in. This week against Cleveland, it’s an amazing spot. Shutdown corner Joe Haden will be focused on Jordy Nelson, which leaves Boykin as the hot read on many routes. It’s a risk starting someone with so little experience but in a high-powered offense like the Packers, it’s a risk worth taking.
Jerome Simpson (at NYG) – This is more a recommendation for those in deep need of a one-week streaming bye week filler. The Giants have given up eight touchdowns to wide receivers this year. Simpson leads the Vikings with 23 catches for 372 yards. What’s more, Josh Freeman has a much stronger arm than Matt Cassell or Christian Ponder and since Simpson’s game is based on speed and the deep ball, this might be the opportunity for Simpson to show his skills and get behind the coverage and actually have a quarterback who can hit him in stride. Not a glowing endorsement, but if you’re in need, Simpson could be a cheap option this week.
Sit ‘em
Jordy Nelson (vs. CLE) – While most people will be high on Nelson since he’s the only reliable weapon at Rodgers’ disposal, I’ll go the opposite route. Not only should he be matched up with Joe Haden, but Nelson will probably draw extra special attention from linebackers and safeties as well. Cleveland allows many running backs to score so between Lacy running the ball and Haden shadowing Nelson, it could be a quiet day for the Packers #1 receiver.
Andre Johnson (at KC) – Yeah, Jon’s lost his mind saying you should sit the NFL leader in receptions. The KC defense ranks first in the NFL in points allowed, turnovers, first downs and interceptions and is second in the league in passing yards allowed. Considering how bad Matt Schaub has been this year, especially in the red zone (Johnson has zero TDs thus far) it’s not crazy to assume this will be a down week for Johnson. Even more so now that they are starting someone who hasn’t yet thrown a single NFL pass. You’re probably still starting him, especially in PPR leagues, but keep expectations low.
Torrey Smith (at PIT) – Since Smith is really the only weapon at Joe Flacco’s disposal, he should see plenty of Ike Taylor this weekend. Don’t think that’s a problem? I think A.J. Green and Brandon Marshall would beg to differ. Only two receivers have reached double-digit points against the Steelers this year so don’t look for Smith to rebound much from last week’s disappointment.
Anquan Boldin (at TEN) – Above I recommended sitting Torrey Smith because the Steelers have only allowed two receivers to reach double-digit fantasy points. Well the Titans have only allowed one. Since his Week 1 outburst Boldin has been anything but a reliable fantasy option. The 49ers have been committed to the running game and utilizing their big advantage at tight end with Vernon Davis. I don’t expect Boldin to buck any of these trends and post a solid week.
Tight Ends
Start ‘em
Kyle Rudolph (at NYG) – Rudolph has been wildly inconsistent this year so it’s tough recommending him after a 9 catch, 97 yard and a touchdown performance. But….this week he gets the Giants who have allowed 10+ fantasy points to tight ends in four of their six games thus far this season. Tight ends average over 6 catches with five touchdowns in six games. Josh Freeman should be an upgrade at the quarterback position for the Vikings so there’s another plus.
Heath Miller (vs. BAL) – You all know by now how I feel about Miller and his impact on the Steelers offense. He’s been targeted 19 times the last three weeks and has totaled 15 grabs for 189 yards. The Ravens have allowed three touchdowns to tight ends in the last five games and Miller is a favorite of Ben Roethlisberger when they get in close. Good shot for a score this week.
Sit ‘em
Greg Olsen (vs. STL) – For the second week in a row it was reported that Olsen was in a walking boot after the game. Not a good sign. While he seems sure to play, that fact combined with the Rams allowing less than 6 points per week to opposing tight ends gets Olsen on my sit list. If the Rams could do a solid job on Tony Gonzalez, Vernon Davis and Jason Witten there’s little reason to expect big things from Olsen.
Charles Clay (vs. BUF) – While Clay is the flavor of the month at the tight end position, this week he’s running into a wall. Buffalo is second to the Kansas City Chiefs in fewest fantasy points allowed to opposing tight ends. Only one tight end has reached double digit fantasy points against the Bills so this looks more like a week for Mike Wallace and Brian Hartline than it does Clay.
Defenses
Start ‘em
Vikings (at NYG) – While the Vikings defense has struggled this season, Week 7 might be the one chance you get to stream them in. The Giants have given up 16 sacks this year so Jared Allen is licking his chops. In addition, the Giants have turned the ball over 23 times this year. That’s eight more than any other NFL team. Eli hasn’t finished a game without throwing a pick yet this year. If the Vikings take one back to the house it’ll be bonus time.
Packers (vs. CLE) – Last week the Lions let me down against Cleveland. I reported then that Brandon Weeden had been sacked 5 times in every game he started and the Lions only got him twice. The Packers have scored double-digit fantasy points in each of the last three games and Weeden historically provides double-digit fantasy points to everyone he plays. Put two and two together and in this instance it should mean ten or more.
Sit ‘em
Bengals (at DET) – The Lions have been a powerful offense this season and therefore have limited the opportunities for opposing defenses to put up fantasy points. Going further, the Bengals have been a much better team at home than on the road. On the fast track in Detroit I can see the likes of Reggie Bush and Calvin Johnson doing some serious damage to this Bengals defense. There are certainly better options out there.
Sorry folks, I just don’t do kickers. You’re on your own there.
See ya next week.
The post Start ‘Em & Sit ‘Em Week 7 appeared first on FFLockerRoom - Fantasy Football Advice - NFL News - Player Rankings.
No comments:
Post a Comment